Children of Men

    I really liked Children of Men.  It really kept me thinking and constantly paying attention and alert to figure out what was going on and why.  It was confusing and hard to follow at times and understand all the random different factors and how they play in in the big scheme of the movie.  After seeing the real life events that occurred that the movie symbolized, the movie makes more sense to me. 
     The movie was really interesting and evokes a lot of emotion, using pathos, especially with the lack of the ability to reproduce in the world.  It also evokes emotion with the prison scene where Miriam is taken and probably tortured and killed.  She was the only alive person in the movie at this time that could help Key and this baby.  Also, the story behind Theo and Jilian and their child.  It was depressing that they lost their baby boy and then separated for whatever reason.  Then when Theo is kidnapped by Jilian's people, we see this odd relationship.  Jilian made her crew stop being mean to him, showing she does have some feelings for him still, but it seems so weird since she had him kidnapped and just how the whole thing was handled.  Next, Jilian kisses Theo right before they go somewhere, which gives light that maybe there is hope for this relationship.  Then Jilian is killed by her own people, which abruptly destroys this hope.  This movie is constantly showing a tiny sliver of hope and then destroys it with this awful tragic event, except for at the end with the boat "Tomorrow" approaching Key in the little dingy. 

Unemployment

    This political cartoon is very realistic, unfortunately.  It relates to all kids in college who are working towards a career, kids in high school wanting to start working after graduating, and the people who just graduated from college.  Tennessee's unemployment rate was 10.1% as of June 2010, and the nation's unemployment rate altogether was recorded as 9.6% in June 2010.  Both the nation and Tennessee were around 6% from 2002 until 2009, when it suddenly skyrocketed to as high as 11.3%.  This is very high, and it seems like many people are constantly losing their jobs and searching for new ones, just so they can feed and provide for their family.  This is a very sad situation.
    This cartoon really does illustrate the economic situation perfectly, as sad as it is.  It is much easier to find a war to join and have something to fight for, rather than being able to find a job.  The soldier, all dressed and ready for war even with his gun over his shoulder and pack on his back, is speaking to the student that just graduated.  Neither of the men are smiling.  Both look irritated and kind of surprised at the bad economic situation.  They are facing different directions, going on their ways in opposite directions, suggesting the separation in the paths.  This cartoon does not offer another option or a middle ground or a combination of the two.  Both men are holding their papers tightly rolled up in their left hands, maybe suggesting that they are both in a similar situation.  This cartoon appeals to the emotions of struggling to find a job and the patriotic pride that comes with a U.S. soldier.

More Analysis

The cartoon appeals to Americans and to the patriotic pride instilled within every American heart by depicting Uncle Sam, but the cartoon's intent is not to encourage or endorse the current policy or actions; but the cartoon's purpose is to shame them for taking such a ridiculous, irresponsible, and insensitive approach and turning their back on the rest of the world when they are so desperate.  The United States had been viewed as the international police officer for decades, and now the police officer is turning a blind eye to an international crisis.  Geisel appeals to the inner sense of responsibility to help others that the Americans had always harbored.  It entreats the people to think if it is morally and ethically sound to ignore the Nazi party conquering people group after people group, country after country.  The cartoon is designed to reveal the selfishness in continuing to ignore the cries for help and twiddle our thumbs and shut our eyes. Geisel beseeches the United States to look around and see the worldwide destruction as a motivation to fight for the freedom of others and suppression of the strong Nazi party, so that no one country controls and rules over the entire world.

            President Franklin Delano Roosevelt addressed the nation on December 8, 1941 as the nation desperately looked to the leader of the country during this distressing and tragic time to figure out the next move.  He bravely declares:

Yesterday, December 7, 1941 - a date which will live in infamy - The United States of             America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of           Japan...As Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy, I have directed that all measures be      taken for our defense...With confidence in our armed forces - with the unbounded                     determination of our people - we will gain the inevitable triumph - so help us God.

Was it ethical and the right decision to wait until our country was attacked and devastated to join the war, or should we have come to the aid and support of our fellow countries to help and defend them against the Nazi party?

I am sorry, but the formatting would not cooperate on the block quote.

Political Cartoon Analysis

Uncle Sam's body language reflects the United States' position as well.  He is sitting up straight but comfortably on a dainty nest with his legs crossed elegantly.  He has a pleasant look on his face with a smile, indicating that the Nazi domination does not bother, displease, or even faze Uncle Sam.  The events and damage around him do not affect his countenance, disposition, or comfortable demeanor and posture.  He is also twiddling his thumbs, as if he is bored and has nothing productive or better to do.  His eyes are closed, suggesting he does not want to look around and see the wreckage all around him; because if he looks around, he may be compelled to help or attempt to stop the Nazi party.  He would rather look at the back of his eyelids and pretend to be ignorant than see the need of the other countries.  Uncle Sam's back is turned to the other countries while they are being subjugated, signifying the betrayal in not assisting the others.  He is also sitting above every other tree except for Britain, which is currently on its way down because of the woodpecker.  This implies that he thinks he is higher, and possibly too high, to be attacked by the woodpecker.  Uncle Sam is not even holding onto the tree tightly, affirming he is not expecting the woodpecker to move onto his tree.

            Most Dr. Seuss cartoons burst with bright colors, but Geisel neglects color.  Color is generally associated with happiness, excitement, and other expressive emotions, so this cartoon appears very bleak, murky, and somber.  There is only one cloud in the entire cartoon, and it is positioned directly above the British tree the Nazi woodpecker is furiously pecking down, foreshadowing the fall and doom of Britain. 

Interesting Political Cartoon

This cartoon caught my attention when I was on Google, and I thought it would make a good topic for a blog. Every presidential candidate always criticizes the last president during the election, saying that they have done so badly in handling the country. The candidates always say that they can fix all the problems the last president created and put the country back on its feet. The candidate always tries to make himself out to be a hero against the terrible former president. Every president has to deal with the mess that the last one made, and each one is trying to do their best. I personally think it is ridiculous and completely immature how the candidates trash the former presidents. George Bush had to deal with president Clinton's policies and his problems while dealing with September 11. George did not carry problems into the United States, but he was surely handed them in the very beginning of his first term of his presidency. I am not against George Bush, but I do not believe that he was a perfect president either. I think he did his best and did as good as anyone else could have done in his place. George Bush is a man just like everyone else, therefore he makes mistakes like everyone else. I believe that he did his best to protect this country and serve the people of the United States. I realize that everyone has the freedom of speech and can say almost whatever they think, and that this freedom is very important to our country, but I do not feel that everything is appropriate or is constructive criticism.